The Basic Principles Of engagement case law in pakistan
The Basic Principles Of engagement case law in pakistan
Blog Article
Given that the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been reached, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by legislation." It can be well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The law enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at via the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court might interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mould the relief to make it acceptable on the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified with the decision with the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
As the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become attained, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A is not obliged to afford a chance of hearing into the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to look at all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors. Read more
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this can be a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents of the boy or Woman don't approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they are able to Slash off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male who is a major, the few is neither harassed by any person nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by law.
163 . Const. P. check here 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be properly-settled that when looking at the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to consider the merit of many of the eligible candidates and after because of deliberations, to grant promotion to these kinds of suitable candidates who are found to generally be most meritorious among them. Considering that the petitioner was held to become senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked by the respondent department just to increase favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part from the respondent department.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.
Accomplishing a case regulation search might be as easy as moving into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case law searches, which include:
Statutory laws are People created by legislative bodies, like Congress at both the federal and state levels. When this kind of legislation strives to condition our society, providing rules and guidelines, it would be difficult for virtually any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” will not be binding, but might be used as persuasive authority, which is to offer substance on the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.